Sample+Rubric


 * Multigenre Research Project Rubric **


 * __ Research Project Requirements: __**
 * 1) You must use AND PROPERLY DOCUMENT at least one print source and one electronic source.
 * 2) You must complete the research folder checklist to reflect your completion of the folder contents.
 * 3) You must explain why you chose the genres that you did as well as their relevance.
 * 4) You must respond to the projects of at least three of your classmates.
 * 5) You must complete the self-assessment and the research project assessment.


 * __ How you will be assessed: __** The project is worth 100 points, and the point break-down is as follows.
 * **CATEGORY ** || **20 Points ** || **17 Points ** || **15 Points ** || **12 Points ** ||
 * **Product Layout ** || Product is very well organized, extremely neat, easy to view, and attractive to the eye. || Product is organized, easy to view, and is attractive to the eye. || Product is somewhat organized and/or somewhat difficult to view. || Product is not organized and is difficult to view. ||
 * **Genre Choices and Explanation ** || Three genres from three different categories, and three fully explained, error-free choice explanations. || Three genres from three different categories, and three adequate choice explanations with 2 or fewer errors. || Three genres from three different categories, and three or more errors in three choice explanations. || Genres from repeated categories, and/or inadequate/nonexistent choice explanations. ||
 * **Sources and Citations ** || At least 1 print source and 1 electronic source used, and all in-text citations are correctly documented. || At least 1 print source and 1 electronic source used, and only 1-2 minor errors in in-text citations. || At least 1 print source and 1 electronic source used, and 3-4 errors in in-text citations. || Source requirements not met, and/or more than 4 errors in in-text citations. ||
 * **Self and Peer Assessments ** || Self and Peer Assessment shows evidence of deep reflection and thoughtful constructive criticism and/or commentary, and at least three peers' products were reviewed. || Self and Peer Assessment shows evidence of reflection and commentary, and at least three peers' products were reviewed. || Self and Peer Assessment shows little evidence of reflection and commentary, and/or only two peers' products were reviewed. || Self and Peer Assessment shows no evidence of reflection and commentary, and/or 1 or no peer's product was reviewed. ||
 * **Conventions ** || No grammatical errors. || Two or fewer grammatical errors. || Three or four grammatical errors. || More than four errors in grammar. ||